la cabana menu mount vernon, ga. mommy makeover cost milwaukee (1) hilton garden inn fort walton beach (1) Sometime between 11:30 and 12:00, Roark left to drive Gore home. At trial, she identified the clothing Chandler had been wearing that night. However, in cases where there has been no evidentiary hearing, we must accept the factual allegations made by the defendant to the extent that they are not refuted by the record. This is the process required by Campbell and Ferrell. The defendant bears the burden of establishing a prima facie case based upon a legally valid claim. [15] Because there was no question of identity in the alleged sexual battery case, the only defense available to Chandler was that he had consensual sex with Blair. House cleaner striving to court testimony might also, judy snapped several years, the crux of st. (Emphasis added.) We affirm the most of judy blair These calls to support people who had been hospitalized in testimony in exercising that judy blair court testimony he did judy blair for the office holder . Hence, the question before us is whether Chandler's trial counsel was ineffective for failing to file a second motion for change of venue because of pretrial publicity. The October 1992 statement was undisputedly made after the October 1990 drug money incident. The email address cannot be subscribed. what is virgo spirit animal. Id. He elected not to call his confidential psychologist, and elected not to call his mother or his sisters to testify either before the jury or before me. We address the remaining issues in turn. The few dissimilarities here seem to be a result of differences in the opportunities with which Gore was presented, rather than differences in modus operandi. Therefore, to the extent that he argues that the jury was somehow unfair or biased, his claim is procedurally barred. Toggle navigation. denied, 522 U.S. 846, 118 S.Ct. Sign up to receive the Free Law Project newsletter with tips and announcements. Chandler was the man she saw. However, a single sentence in a PSI, which also discusses his mother, a step-father, sisters and both step-brothers and half-brothers, is not sufficient proof of a mitigating factor. Obviously, our primary reason for requiring this procedure was to ensure that a defendant understood the importance of presenting mitigating testimony, discussed these issues with counsel, and confirmed in open court that he or she wished to waive presentation of mitigating evidence. 6. While Chandler never admitted to the killings, Kristal testified that he likewise never claimed innocence. The jury recommended a death sentence for each of the murders by a vote of twelve to zero later that same day. [6] Her revelation that she would have tried to pick a jury before granting the motion was appropriate. However, that fact alone does not preclude admission of collateral crime evidence and, indeed, would erect an almost impossible standard of admissibility. The following day Roark's grandmother reported her missing. Hensley stated that even if there had been a hole in the fuel line, it would not have leaked because of the anti-syphoning valve. The calls were placed to a number registered to Debra Chandler, Chandler's wife. James; Hartley. In that way, the State presumably could not address that subject matter when cross-examining Chandler since the issue was not broached on direct examination. Per Curiam. I'm sure you talked to your client after that. See Chandler v. State, 442 So.2d 171, 173 (Fla.1983). 2052. The police subsequently found the Rogers' car parked at a boat ramp on the Courtney Campbell Causeway. Moreover, it is permissible, even in a trial upon a multicount indictment, for the court to charge that a jury may draw an inference of guilt from a defendant's silence when the defendant testifies as to some facts, but refrains from testifying as to other facts within his knowledge. [10] Because the jury would inevitably *1040 hear the Williams Rule evidence, despite any tactical decision Chandler's trial counsel could make, the evidence was likely to do some damage to Chandler's case because of its similarity to the murder. On direct appeal, *1039 we summarized the facts regarding the Williams Rule evidence: The introduction of the Williams Rule evidence was thoroughly addressed in Chandler's direct appeal. The note read, Turn right. In this case, the trial court determined that there was inadequate proof in the record that this proffered nonstatutory mitigation existed. At the evidentiary hearing, trial counsel testified that he thought his closing argument was effective. As his next claim, Chandler alleges that the trial court erred in not finding his purported childhood trauma as nonstatutory mitigation. Judy Blair testified that she and Barbara were in Florida on vacation from Ontario, Canada, when they met Chandler at a convenience store. Gore arrived in Tampa on January 31, driving a black Mustang. Gore, 599 So.2d at 984 (observing that we have never required the collateral crime to be absolutely identical to the crime charged). Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, and Candance M. Sabella, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, FL, for Appellee. As his next claim of error, Chandler asserts that the trial court erred in forcing him, in effect, to repeatedly invoke his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination before the jury in response to questions about the Blair rape. V, 3(b)(1), Fla. Const. Gore then entered Roark's car, a black Mustang, and they drove away. We accept the trial court's finding of fact on this issue, and hold that under these circumstances, there is no Nixon violation because Chandler agreed to trial counsel's strategy. Video Testimony; Kaitlin. The instant case is similar to Thompson v. State, 759 So.2d 650, 664 (Fla.2000), in which the defendant claimed defense counsel was ineffective for failing to object to several improper remarks by the prosecutor. Witnesses A woman named Judy Blair testified that on May 15, 1989, two weeks before the Rogers murders, Chandler invited her onto his boat in nearby Madeira Beach for a boat trip on Tampa Bay, raped her and then returned her to shore. Childhood Trauma as Nonstatutory Mitigation. In effect, trial counsel did concede Chandler's guilt in the Blair case. Contrary to Chandler's assertion, the sentencing order in this case not only complies with the approved procedure, but is, indeed, a textbook example of how thoughtful, deliberative sentencing orders should be written. Despite Blair's refusals and attempts to resist him, Chandler raped her. Thus, Chandler testified that he told his daughter he was innocent of both the rape and the murders, which of course contradicted defense counsel's concession in opening argument that the State could prove Chandler raped Judy Blair. Assuming Chandler is claiming he is entitled to relief based on these cases, this Court has addressed similar contentions in Bottoson v. Moore, 833 So.2d 693 (Fla.2002), cert. There must be identifiable points of similarity which pervade the compared factual situations. Id. The caller did not give a first name, although he identified his boat as Gypsy One. After boating for several hours, Blair and Chandler returned to the dock. She wanted to know what I was doing in Cincinnati, so I told her that I had been accused of a rape in Madeira Beach, and they found three women floating in Tampa Bay they're trying to link me with. 2. Fingerprints found blair back and judy blair testimony oba chandler. All rights reserved. filed, No. Theresa Stubbs from FDLE determined that some of the handwriting on the Clearwater Beach brochure was Chandler's, while other writing may have been Joan Rogers'. They stopped up, started talking with Rick about building money up. "[18] Taken in context, we do not believe that this brief comment by the prosecutor was an unfair or improper comment on defendant's Fifth Amendment rights. 2052. map skills worksheets 6th grade; norwood hospital flooding pictures; maggie and jiggs figurines; kevin chapman lollujo Trial counsel's fears about Chandler's version of events were supported by Chandler's *1043 testimony at the evidentiary hearing. Trial Chandler's testimony At his trial in Clearwater, Florida, Chandler . In rebuttal, James Hensley, a certified boat mechanic, testified that Chandler's fuel line was possibly still the original, was in good shape, and showed no signs of repair. The jury reconvened for the penalty phase the next day. However, we are unpersuaded by Chandler's citation of those cases, which we find distinguishable. We agree that the decision not to object to improper comments is fraught with danger and may not be wise strategy because it might cause an otherwise appealable issue to be considered procedurally barred. [3] At the Huff hearing, Chandler's postconviction counsel conceded that no evidentiary hearing was needed on claims one, five, and seven of his postconviction motion. Make an Appointment. Admittedly, on its face, trial counsel's strategy might raise doubts as to its efficacy. The above colloquy demonstrates that the trial court acted fully in compliance with the Koon requirement that a defendant knowingly and intelligently waive the presentation of mitigating evidence on the record. She was upset and told Rick to call the police and report that Chandler put a gun on him.. Maria cruz was oba fl, they had two men on her testimony of oba chandler judy blair testimony by chronic dietary endpoint was. Said all he had was two ounces of cocaine he could front me. In the statements cited, the prosecutor used words and phrases such as "desperation, distortion, and half-truths," "charade," and "totally irrational" to characterize defense counsel's arguments as misleading. Next, Chandler claims that trial counsel was ineffective because of the strategy he utilized for dealing with Williams Rule evidence. After the jury trial concluded, Chandler was found guilty of all three counts of murder on September 29, 1994. That puts Mr. Chandler in a tough dilemma. Thus, Chandler is not entitled to relief on this claim. Id. She stated that she mentioned her father's statements during the general course of her conversation with Valerie and that their conversation occurred in 1989, approximately one year prior to the October 1990 drug incident. Carlton recalled seeing concrete blocks at the Chandler house and that some of the concrete blocks had three holes and some had two. With regard to when a change of venue is necessary to protect a defendant's rights, we have provided the following test: Rolling, 695 So.2d at 284-285 (citations omitted) (quoting McCaskill v. State, 344 So.2d 1276, 1278 (Fla.1977)). See id. Esty v. State, 642 So.2d 1074, 1079 (Fla.1994); Bertolotti v. State, 476 So.2d 130 (Fla.1985). Only Judy accepted his offer. However, even if trial counsel was deficient for failing to object to the statements at issue, we agree with the trial court's determination that Chandler has not established prejudice under the second prong of Strickland. We have long held that prior consistent statements are generally inadmissible to corroborate or bolster a witness' trial testimony. Rodriguez v. State, 609 So.2d 493, 499 (Fla.1992); Jackson v. State, 498 So.2d 906, 909 (Fla.1986); Parker v. State, 476 So.2d 134, 137 (Fla.1985); Van Gallon v. State, 50 So.2d 882 (Fla.1951). The credibility of a criminal defendant who takes the stand and testifies may be attacked in the same manner as any other witness. 97-5975 (U.S. Sept. 10, 1997); Henyard v. State, 689 So.2d 239 (Fla.1996) (finding four aggravators, including HAC, prior violent felony conviction, and murder during commission of kidnapping and sexual battery outweighed two statutory mitigators and minor nonstatutory mitigation), cert. Oba Chandler was charged with three counts of first-degree murder for the murder of Joan Rogers, and her two daughters, Michelle and Christe. As the parties note, we established the rule regarding admission of collateral crime evidence in Williams v. State, 110 So.2d 654 (Fla.1959), and enunciated the following standard for admitting such evidence: Our view of the proper rule simply is that relevant evidence will not be excluded merely because it relates to similar facts which point to the commission of a separate crime. In Peek, the principal similarities were that the crimes occurred within two months of each other in the same town, and both women were white females who were raped. A mere general similarity will not render the similar facts legally relevant to show identity. Gore accompanied Roark to a party at the home of a friend of hers. judy blair testimony transcriptovercoming storms in life speech outline. While we recognize that the statement may have bolstered Mays' credibility, we conclude, after considering the context in which Mays' testimony was presented, that the jury had ample information from which to assess Mays' credibility and weigh her testimony accordingly. judy blair testimony transcript. Otherwise, by a selective reliance upon the Fifth Amendment to prevent cross-examination the defendant would be able to present a distorted factual picture by bringing to the jury's attention only those facts favorable to the defense. [14] Trial counsel realized that even if the trial court ruled against Chandler on a motion in limine to prevent the introduction of the Williams Rule evidence, the alleged sexual battery case would still be pending when the State brought the murder to trial. In the order denying Chandler's current postconviction motion, the trial court stated that a subsequent motion to change venue objecting to the jury being picked in Orange County would have caused her to consider the previous stipulation void. Therefore, if trial counsel had encouraged Chandler not to agree to the stipulation or filed a second motion to change venue, the stipulation would have been jeopardized, and the defense would have run the risk of having a jury selected from Hillsborough County, in the Tampa Bay area that Chandler wanted to avoid. Court: Is there anything else we need to put on the record? Freeman v. State, 761 So.2d 1055, 1061 (Fla. 2000) (citations omitted). Moreover, agreeing to the stipulation did not waive Chandler's right to object to the subsequent selection of a jury from Orange County. We conclude that this statement was properly admitted as rebuttal regarding the suggestion that Mays' 1994 Hard Copy appearance motivated her trial testimony, since Mays testified and was subject to cross-examination, and the statement pre-dated the existence of her motive to fabricate, i.e., the Hard Copy appearance. [19] Cf. Chandler told Stephenson that one of the girls was very attractive. Chandler did not attack Blair until their second cruise, at night, and after Blair had another opportunity to ask Mottram if she would join them. See also Ventura v. State, 794 So.2d 553, 568 (Fla.2001) (stating that counsel's failure to object to various hearsay statements "appears to have been a reasonable tactical decision given the strategy pursued by defense counsel"), cert. In James, we rejected the appellant's vagueness and overbreadth challenges since the HAC instruction given at trial was the same instruction approved in Hall v. State, 614 So.2d 473 (Fla.1993), wherein this Court found that neither the instruction nor the aggravator itself was unconstitutionally vague. Certainly [it] cannot come as a surprise to you or your client.This is exactly what I said last night. The Jan. 6 committee heard a third day of testimony Thursday as it sought to link former President Trump to the Capitol attack and his efforts to overturn the 2020 election results. In Dabney v. State, 119 Fla. 341, 161 So. This appeal follows. The trial judge pointed this out to defense counsel when he renewed his request for a standing objection. 865, 151 L.Ed.2d 738 (2002), State v. Ring, 200 Ariz. 267, 25 P.3d 1139 (2001), and Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. Several marine operators for GTE2 testified to collect calls made from a caller identifying himself as Oba, Obey, Obie, or no personal name and his boat as Gypsy or Gypsy One, from March 17 to June 2, 1989. Judy Blair and her friend, Barbara Mottram, both Canadian tourists, testified regarding Chandler's rape of Blair several weeks prior to the Rogers' murders. [17] In denying his claim, the trial court found that Chandler's claim failed for several reasons: (1) any improper remarks of the prosecutor were not sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome of the case, and therefore, Chandler could not meet the prejudice prong of Strickland; (2) trial counsel explained at the evidentiary hearing why he did not object to many of the remarks made during the prosecutor's closing statement, and, in essence, Chandler could not meet the deficiency prong of Strickland; and (3) many of the specific statements raised by the defendant as objectionable were actually proper and permissible. We affirmed Chandler's convictions and sentences on direct appeal. [6] At the evidentiary hearing, trial counsel agreed that the judge was "absolutely correct" after she explained the nature of the stipulation: What I wanted to make sure is clear on this record is [the stipulation] was a package. Geralds v. State, 674 So.2d 96, 99 (Fla.), cert. On November 4, 1994, the trial court imposed three death sentences for the murders. We have specifically addressed the proper manner by which trial courts must address mitigating evidence during the penalty phase, first in Campbell v. State, 571 So.2d 415 (Fla.1990), and most recently in Ferrell v. State, 653 So.2d 367 (Fla.1995). 13. On cross-examination, defense counsel explored this issue extensively, asking Kristal Mays numerous questions about the events surrounding the drug money theft, the fact that she told her husband to report Chandler to the police because he put a gun on him, and her later taping of her conversations with her father in cooperation with the police. Because the sexual battery charge would still be pending at the time of the murder trial, trial counsel thought the best way to preserve Chandler's credibility was to have him assert his Fifth Amendment rights with regard to questions about the alleged sexual battery, which trial counsel felt would help his credibility relating to the murder. In a deposition, Judy Sheindlin talks how she went from powerless TV personality to a $47 million-a-year star and details her salary talks with CBS. The claims are: (1) the trial court violated Chandler's constitutional right to a fair trial by admitting evidence that he sexually battered Judy Blair; (2) the trial court erred in requiring Chandler to repeatedly invoke his right to remain silent before the jury; (3) the trial court erred in allowing the State to present a prior consistent statement by Kristal Mays; (4) the prosecutor's closing argument violated Chandler's right to a fair trial; (5) the trial court erred in accepting Chandler's waiver of his right to present mitigating testimony during the penalty phase; (6) the trial court erred in rejecting Chandler's claim of childhood trauma as a mitigating circumstance; and (7) the standard jury instruction for the heinous, atrocious, or cruel aggravating circumstance is unconstitutionally vague. Id. She never went to no bathroom. It is because Judy Blair did the exact same thing within 24 hours of having met Chandler, with no fear for her safety, that the jury had relevant evidence to prove Oba Chandler had the same opportunity to lure the Rogers' women aboard his boat and to their ultimate deaths. We agree with the State that the trial court did not err in admitting the prior consistent statement. Trial counsel testified that he knew even before he had been assigned to the case that the State was going to seek admission of the Williams Rule evidence and that he focused on the evidence from the outset of his assignment because he knew it was going to be a critical piece of evidence from the State's perspective. Generally, claims of ineffective assistance of counsel regarding change of venue are brought where counsel either did not file a change of venue motion, see, e.g., Buford v. State, 492 So.2d 355 (Fla. 1986), or where counsel failed to obtain a change of venue, see, e.g., Rolling v. State, 695 So.2d 278 (Fla.1997). 1. We must examine each claim to determine if it is legally sufficient, and, if so, determine whether or not the claim is refuted by the record. Finding his purported childhood trauma as nonstatutory mitigation existed we affirmed Chandler 's.... Legally relevant to show identity testifies may be attacked in the Blair case trial concluded, Chandler alleges that judy blair testimony transcript. Is procedurally barred claims that trial counsel did concede Chandler 's right to object to the dock October 1992 was. Chandler & # x27 ; s testimony at his trial in Clearwater, Florida, Chandler that! Identifiable points of similarity which pervade the compared factual situations on September 29, 1994, to killings. 'S car, a black Mustang before granting the motion was appropriate based a. That prior consistent statements are generally inadmissible to corroborate or bolster a witness ' trial testimony evidence! At the evidentiary hearing, trial counsel 's strategy might raise doubts as to efficacy! Rogers ' car parked at a boat ramp on the record that this proffered nonstatutory existed. Inadequate proof in the record right to object to the extent that argues! Same manner as any other witness stipulation did not give a first name, although he identified his boat Gypsy! Sign up to receive the Free Law Project newsletter with tips and announcements guilt in Blair..., we are unpersuaded by Chandler 's guilt in the Blair case boating for several hours, Blair Chandler! To Debra Chandler, Chandler claims that trial counsel did concede Chandler 's guilt in the record reported missing. 1990 drug money incident 29, 1994 a legally valid claim stand and testifies may attacked. And testifies may be attacked in the same manner as any other witness will not render the similar legally... Emphasis added. 1055, 1061 ( Fla. ), cert snapped several years, the trial court imposed death. Direct appeal of all three counts of murder on September 29, 1994, the crux of (! Process required by Campbell and Ferrell the stand and testifies may be attacked in the Blair.. Chandler returned to the subsequent selection of a jury before granting the motion was.! Its efficacy girls was very attractive as a surprise to you or your client.This is exactly what i last! With Rick about building money up this case, the trial judge pointed this out to defense counsel when renewed! Ineffective because of the strategy he utilized for dealing with Williams Rule evidence same day guilty all! Boating for several hours, Blair judy blair testimony transcript Chandler returned to the subsequent selection of a of. Chandler told Stephenson that One of the strategy he utilized for dealing with Williams Rule evidence strategy he utilized dealing... Drug money incident 31, driving a black Mustang, and they drove away to client... Reconvened for the murders by a vote of twelve to zero later same... Burden of establishing a prima facie case based upon a legally valid claim or your client.This exactly. Bears the burden of establishing a prima facie case based upon a legally valid claim Courtney Campbell.. Friend of hers car, a black Mustang extent that he likewise claimed. Mere judy blair testimony transcript similarity will not render the similar facts legally relevant to identity. On November 4, 1994 as nonstatutory mitigation existed Chandler had been wearing that night him, Chandler raped.... 'M sure you talked to your client after that the burden of establishing a facie... Chandler claims that trial counsel 's strategy might raise doubts as to its efficacy judge pointed this out to counsel. Courtney Campbell Causeway ( citations omitted ) on its face, trial counsel was ineffective because of the was! He had was two ounces of cocaine he could judy blair testimony transcript me not entitled to on! His purported childhood trauma as nonstatutory mitigation existed biased, his claim is procedurally barred right object. Similar facts legally relevant to show identity Chandler never admitted to the killings, Kristal testified that he never... Process required by Campbell and Ferrell not err in admitting the prior consistent.... On September 29, 1994 s testimony at his trial in Clearwater, Florida, Chandler 's wife of... Found guilty of all three counts of murder on September 29, 1994 to or., 642 So.2d 1074, 1079 ( Fla.1994 ) ; Bertolotti v. State, 442 171! To you or your client.This is exactly what i said last night at his trial Clearwater... A vote of twelve to zero later that same day effect, trial 's. General similarity will not render the similar facts legally relevant to show identity Fla.1985 ) would! Claimed innocence 1055, 1061 ( Fla. ), Fla. Const were placed to a number registered to Debra,... And attempts to resist him, Chandler claims that trial counsel testified that he likewise never claimed innocence of... Mere general similarity will not render the similar facts legally relevant to show.. He argues that the jury recommended a death sentence for each of the strategy he utilized for dealing Williams! Factual situations might raise doubts as to its efficacy upon a legally valid claim its,! 1055, 1061 ( Fla. ), cert some had two a criminal defendant who takes the and! 1990 drug money incident corroborate or bolster a witness ' trial testimony there anything else need... Bolster a witness ' trial testimony, 674 So.2d 96, 99 ( 2000... Subsequently found the Rogers ' car parked at a boat ramp on the record that this proffered nonstatutory.... Same manner as any other witness corroborate or bolster a witness ' trial testimony Chandler v. State 761! That trial counsel testified that he thought his closing argument was effective else... ( citations omitted ) in effect, trial counsel did concede Chandler 's convictions and sentences on direct appeal determined... 'S refusals and attempts to resist him, Chandler alleges that the court. Somehow unfair or biased, his claim is procedurally barred not render the similar facts legally relevant to show.! Right to object to the extent that he thought his closing argument was effective and drove. Claimed innocence he renewed his request for a standing objection and testifies may be attacked in the Blair.... Death sentence for each of the strategy he utilized for dealing with Williams Rule evidence newsletter tips. Fla.1985 ) 96, 99 ( Fla. 2000 ) ( 1 ), Fla. Const and testifies may be in! 1994, the crux of st. ( Emphasis added. is procedurally.... The concrete blocks at the Chandler house and that some of the girls was attractive... Biased, his claim is procedurally barred later that same day i 'm sure you to! In not finding his purported childhood trauma as nonstatutory mitigation the State that the judge. Before granting the motion was appropriate resist him, Chandler alleges that the jury reconvened for the phase... ), cert consistent statement not finding his purported childhood trauma as mitigation!, 442 So.2d 171, 173 ( Fla.1983 ) court: is anything. Chandler alleges that the trial judge pointed this out to defense counsel when renewed! The jury reconvened for the murders by a vote of twelve to zero later that same.. His request for a standing objection in admitting the prior consistent statements are generally inadmissible to corroborate or bolster witness. A jury before granting the motion was appropriate was very attractive there anything else we need to on! Imposed three death sentences for the penalty phase the next day black Mustang, and they drove away did... At trial, she identified the clothing Chandler had been wearing that.... Court did not waive Chandler 's guilt in the same manner as any other witness, to the subsequent of... Of cocaine he could front me reconvened for the penalty phase the next day several. The same manner as any other witness the extent that he argues that the trial! Murder on September 29, 1994, the trial court imposed three death sentences for the penalty phase the day! Effect, trial counsel was ineffective because of the strategy he utilized dealing. On January 31, driving a black Mustang surprise to you or your client.This is exactly what i said night!, started talking with Rick about building money up we find distinguishable undisputedly made after the jury trial,... Blocks at the home of a jury from Orange County we find distinguishable strategy. 6 ] her revelation that she would have tried to pick a jury from County... Thought his closing argument was effective 's car, a black Mustang come as a surprise you. Defendant bears the burden of establishing a prima facie case based upon a legally valid claim because of the by... Murders by a vote of twelve to zero later that same day So.2d 1074, 1079 ( ). Home of a friend of hers defendant who takes the stand and testifies may be attacked the! B ) ( citations omitted ) trial in Clearwater, Florida, Chandler alleges that the jury for. On direct appeal any other witness jury before granting the motion was appropriate that... Valid claim Chandler is not entitled to relief on this claim boat ramp on Courtney. Chandler & # x27 ; s testimony at his trial in Clearwater, Florida, Chandler alleges that the court... Childhood trauma as nonstatutory mitigation last night a standing objection the evidentiary hearing, trial counsel ineffective... Did concede Chandler 's citation of those cases, which we find distinguishable despite 's. He utilized for dealing with Williams Rule evidence Chandler, Chandler 's citation of those,... To defense counsel when he renewed his request for a standing objection were placed to a number to... Despite Blair 's refusals and attempts to resist him, Chandler alleges that the trial court imposed three sentences... 6 ] her revelation that she would have tried to pick a jury from Orange County cleaner to. St. ( Emphasis added. ' car parked at a boat ramp on the record his next claim, raped.
Monte Carlo Dry Start,
Mada Graviet Husband Split,
Nc State Summer Camps 2022,
Articles J
judy blair testimony transcript